<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>American History Prints &#187; Signatures</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?feed=rss2&#038;cat=10" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.americanhistoryprints.com</link>
	<description>Reproductions of historical prints and associated text</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 May 2007 05:12:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Three Signatories</title>
		<link>http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?p=21</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?p=21#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 20:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1600s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern New England]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?p=21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Southern New England, 1639-45, image 1 of 19 The First Connecticut Constitution “The colony thus founded a Christian Commonwealth and a purely democratic republic upon the first written constitution of any State in America, if not indeed, in the world. And this, with such slight changes in its practical provisions as the increase of population [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Southern New England, 1639-45, image 1 of 19</i><br />
<strong>The First Connecticut Constitution</strong><br />
“The colony thus founded a Christian Commonwealth and a purely democratic republic upon the first written constitution of any State in America, if not indeed, in the world.  And this, with such slight changes in its practical provisions as the increase of population demanded, was the fundamental law of Connecticut for nearly two centuries.  Its first governor, chosen in April 1639, was John Haynes, who had already been a governor of Massachusetts Bay; it second, elected the next year, was Edward Hopkins.  The constitution provided that the chief magistrate should be chosen for a single year only, and was ineligible for the year next ensuing.  The letter of the law was observed while its spirit was not lost.  The people of Connecticut knew when they had a good governor, and for many years, with two or three exceptions at the outset, Haynes and Hopkins were alternately elected to that office.”<a href='http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/sn01threesignatures.jpg' title='Three Signatories of the First Connecticut Constitution'><img style='float:right; margin:5px 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;' src='http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/sn01threesignatures.jpg' width="450" height="348" border="0" alt='Three Signatories of the First Connecticut Constitution' /></a></p>
<p>“The rule of the magistrate in the young Commonwealth was rigid.  The common welfare demanded implicit submission to a compact for mutual protection.  The virtuous and the orderly might be, as they usually are, a law unto themselves; but there was special need of watchfulness and restraint of the idle, the vicious, and the violent, who, relieved from the accustomed rule of a long organized society, would riot in the license of relaxed law.  All the old bonds that hold society together, and kept anarchy at arms-length were loosened.  The habit of obedience to constituted authority needed to be reestablished by fresh subjection and enforced discipline.  In this respect the colonies were all alike.  Each had to work out for itself with such wisdom and such vigor as it could command, the problem of self-government; and each addressed itself, first of all, to the question of self-preservation.  Large consideration of the science of government concerned them less at this early stage of their existence than the daily conduct of each individual citizen.  There was nothing in morals or in manners, as to what men should eat and drink and wherewithal they should be clothed; how they should dispose of their time and their industry; what their relations should be to each other, to the state, to their wives, to their children; &#8211; in all the affairs of life, whether small or great, there was nothing of which the law did not take cognizance.  It was needful to the preservation and good order of society so newly organized that it should do so; and if sometimes – indeed very often – the true and sole function of perfected government, protection of person and property, was overstepped, and intellectual freedom encroached upon in the attempt to regulate religious belief and coerce the conscience, such exercise of power is to be pardoned to the exigencies of the times.”</p>
<p>“There were not probably more than a thousand people in the three Connecticut towns when the Pequot war was finished; the first English child born on the banks of that river (David, son of Captain Lion Gardiner, born at Saybrook Fort, April, 1636) was at that time only eighteen months old.  It was not difficult for the watchful eyes of the magistrates to scan carefully the life and conversation of each man and woman.  Nor could it be doubted that a community made up, in some degree, of mere adventurers, should have its vicious element, though each settlement was at first a church led in a body by its pastor from three Massachusetts towns – Newton, Watertown, and Dorchester.  Even the godly people of the Dorchester church were led, Governor Bradford said, by a “hankering mind” to the pleasant Connecticut meadows on which Holmes’s colony from Plymouth had already settled; and by sheer weight of numbers and the influence of the stronger government behind them, they dispossessed the first comers.  When such were the saints what might not be looked for from the sinners?  The devil lurked even among the churches of the Puritans, and if he could not be got rid of altogether at least he could be watched with unceasing vigilance.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=21</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Signature of Momauguin</title>
		<link>http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?p=42</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?p=42#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 21:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1600s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern New England]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Southern New England, 1638-45 4 of 19 Signature of Momauguin “But there were two reasons, imperative with the new-comers, for seeking a place for their future home without the bounds of Massachusetts: there was too much theological controversy and not sufficient harbor accommodation about the Bay. The banishment of Mrs. Hutchinson was not the extirpation [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Southern New England, 1638-45 4 of 19</i><br />
<strong>Signature of Momauguin</strong><br />
“But there were two reasons, imperative with the new-comers, for seeking a place for their future home without the bounds of Massachusetts: there was too much theological controversy and not sufficient harbor accommodation about the Bay.  The banishment of Mrs. Hutchinson was not the extirpation of heresy, and Mr. Davenport, it is said, was fearful lest his flock should be led astray by the fatal doctrines of the Antinomians.  Whatever other dangers might lurk in the wilderness, the Indians would not, at least, unsettle men’s minds as to sanctification and justification.  The other point was equally clear: the farming lands near all the good harbors about the Bay were already occupied.  Agriculture must, of course, be their immediate reliance; but they hoped to found a commercial colony, and therefore sought for a commodious port where trade would grow, while lands not too far off to be conveniently cultivated should yield them a subsistence.  Another reason given was that they wished to put themselves beyond the reach of a general governor, should one be appointed for all New England; but as this had ceased to be probably, the alleged fear of it could only have been a thin disguise for a more substantial purpose – a wish to escape the jurisdiction of Massachusetts and have an independent government of their own.”<a href='http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/sn04momauguinsig.jpg' style='float:right; margin:5px 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;' title='Signature of Momauguin'><img src='http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/sn04momauguinsig.jpg' width="450" height="262" border="0" alt='Signature of Momauguin' /></a></p>
<p>“In the spring of 1638, the whole company sailed from Boston for Quinnipiack, now New Haven, purchased the preceding autumn from Momauguin, the Indian sachem, for twelve coats of English cloth, twelve alchemy spoons, twelve hatchets, twelve hoes, two dozen knives, twelve porringers and four cases of French knives and scissors.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=42</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Signature of Theophilus Eaton</title>
		<link>http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?p=49</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?p=49#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 22:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1600s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Connecticut]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern New England]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Southern New England, 1639-45, image 7 of 19 Signature of Theophilus Eaton “Two months later the people were again assembled; again they were exhorted and counseled by Davenport, with the Bible between his hands. He was now, however, more than leader by weight of character and respect for his learning; the church had chosen him [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Southern New England, 1639-45, image 7 of 19</i><br />
<strong>Signature of Theophilus Eaton</strong><br />
“Two months later the people were again assembled; again they were exhorted and counseled by Davenport, with the Bible between his hands.  He was now, however, more than leader by weight of character and respect for his learning; the church had chosen him as the pastor, content to accept him as consecrated to the duties of his sacred office by the simple laying on of hands of two of their own number, indifferent to apostolic succession and the authority of bishops.  He spoke, therefore, now with greater authority than ever; and under his guidance the popular church proceeded to the organization of a popular government.”<a href='http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/sn07theophiluseatonsig.jpg' title='Signature of Theophilus Eaton'><img style='float:right; margin:5px 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;' src='http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/sn07theophiluseatonsig.jpg' width="450" height="267" border="0" alt='Signature of Theophilus Eaton' /></a></p>
<p>“Theophilus Eaton was chosen its first governor.  In its general provisions – as to the holding of General Courts, the number and choice of magistrates, the exercise of legislative and judicial power, the rights of the citizen, and his responsibility to the law – it was essentially the same as that of Connecticut in all outward form, as in its purely democratic spirit.  But after all it was democracy with a proviso; the right of self government in holding or in choosing to office was restricted to those who were members of that church.  Others, who also assumed to call themselves Christians, were as completely shut out from any share in the government as a hundred and fifty years later the Constitution of the United States excluded “Indians not taxed” and “persons held to service or labor.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=49</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Signatures of Miantonomo and Canonicus</title>
		<link>http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?p=63</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?p=63#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Apr 2007 23:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1600s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern New England]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Southern New England &#8211; 1638-45, image 14 of 19 Signatures of Miantonomo and Canonicus “All these went forth with the God-speeds and good wishers of the brethren of Massachusetts; but not so with the founders of Rhode Island. Roger Williams fled out into the night and the winter’s storm, with the order of the General [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Southern New England &#8211; 1638-45, image 14 of 19</i><br />
<strong>Signatures of Miantonomo and Canonicus</strong><br />
“All these went forth with the God-speeds and good wishers of the brethren of Massachusetts; but not so with the founders of Rhode Island.  Roger Williams fled out into the night and the winter’s storm, with the order of the General Court behind him, the officers of the law in hot pursuit, and a ship waiting in the offing to bear him into perpetual banishment across the sea.  The shelter which puritan intolerance denied him he sought and found among savage friends.  As he, the next spring, with only five companions, paddled his canoe along the shore of Providence Bay, their thoughts were less of hierarchies and of commonwealths, than where the sunniest slope could be found for a field of maize, the most sheltered and convenient nook for huts.”<a href='http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/sn14twosignatures.jpg' style='float:right; margin:5px 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;' title='Signatures of Miantonomo and Canonicus'><img width="450" height="387" border="0" src='http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/sn14twosignatures.jpg' alt='Signatures of Miantonomo and Canonicus' /></a></p>
<p>“Mooshausick, as the place was called where Williams hope to find rest at last – and which he named Providence, because, he said, ‘of God’s merciful providence unto me in my distress’ – he desired, also, ‘might be for a shelter for those distressed in conscience.’  It was not long ere such asylums were needed.  Whether the exercise then and there of the right of fee thought and free speech was wise or foolish, whether it was harmless or baneful either to church or state, the attempt to suppress that right was altogether futile.”</p>
<p>“Roger Williams had not long to wait for companionship.  Within two years from the time of his landing upon Slate Rock such accessions were made to his colony that ‘the lands on the two fresh rivers, Wowasquatuckett and Mooshausick,’ granted to him by Canonicus and Miantonomo, he conveyed to twelve associates for thirty pounds.  These incorporated themselves and all that should be subsequently admitted, into a township, promising to render ‘an active or passive obedience to all such orders or agreements as shall be made for public good, by the consent of the majority.  But the submissions was to be ‘only in civil things.’ ”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=63</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Signature of John Davenport</title>
		<link>http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?p=77</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?p=77#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 22:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[1600s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rhode Island]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signatures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Southern New England]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?p=77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“For six years, as we have already said, this question of confederation was a topic of anxious discussion. Though so strictly defined and limited, it was only with the utmost caution that the several colonies consented to surrender the rights of self-government even for so obvious a good as a sure protection against their enemies. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“For six years, as we have already said, this question of confederation was a topic of anxious discussion.  Though so strictly defined and limited, it was only with the utmost caution that the several colonies consented to surrender the rights of self-government even for so obvious a good as a sure protection against their enemies.  Perhaps the league would have been even longer delayed had not other than Indian wars been thought possible.  The people along the southern coast of New England had turned their resolute faces and longing eyes towards New Netherland.  The people of Massachusetts, or, at least, the leaders among them, never lost sight of the hope of absolute independence which first moved them to transfer their company, with its charter, quietly and secretly from London to Massachusetts Bay.  They watched with absorbing interest the progress of the Revolution in England, cautious of any rash precipitancy, but ready for any emergency by which they might be involved in that great struggle, and any event that might be turned to their own advantage.  That General Court of Massachusetts which ratified the act of confederacy, also decreed that in the oath of allegiance taken by the Governor and magistrates they should omit ‘for the present’ the words ‘you shall bear true faith and allegiance to our Sovereign Lord King Charles;’ for the king, they said, ‘had violated the privileges of Parliament, and made war upon them.’ ”</p>
<p>“But from the first New England confederacy – with its immediate purpose of defence and offence against the Indians, and the possible purposes which time might bring forth – Gorges’s colony at Agamenticus (York) in Main, and the plantations on the Narragansett, were rigidly excluded.  The Puritans dreaded the state and the church from which they had fled, and which Gorges represented; they hated the heretics who had escaped to Rhode Island from the persecutions of the church and the state which they sought to establish.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=77</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Signature of Captain John Mason</title>
		<link>http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?p=34</link>
		<comments>http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?p=34#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 21:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Pequot War]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Signatures]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?p=34</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pequot War, 1636-37, image 12 of 13 The signature of Captain John Mason, Officer during The Pequot War “Whether the fault was in the method by which the Puritans sought to bring the Indians to a knowledge of the true faith, or whether these people are by nature incapable of being anything but savages, all [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Pequot War, 1636-37, image 12 of 13</i><br />
<strong>The signature of Captain John Mason, Officer during The Pequot War</strong><br />
 “Whether the fault was in the method by which the Puritans sought to bring the Indians to a knowledge of the true faith, or whether these people are by nature incapable of being anything but savages, all attempts at their Christianization and civilization were, in the main, futile.  They had undoubtedly fewer vices and more virtures when the country was first occupied by Europeans than they have ever had since; but after fifty years of labor with them under these most favorable circumstances, of all the thousands of the New England tribes, less than fifteen hundred, with their wives and children, were numbered among the ‘Praying Indians.’  Many more than that number had meanwhile been destroyed in two Indian wars.  The work of killing was far more successful than that of converting, and their utter extinction, though gradual, was certain.”<a href='http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/pq12johnmasonsig.jpg' title='Signature of Captain John Mason'><img src='http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/04/pq12johnmasonsig.jpg' alt='Signature of Captain John Mason' /></a></p>
<p> “But there was an interval of forty years between those wars.  That with the Pequots was so sharp and decisive a lesson that a generation passed away, and there were none left to bear the Pequot totem, ere the jealousy of the English overcame the memory of ther prowess, and led the Indians to venture upon another attempt at extermination.  That interval of repose was of the last importance to the colonists.  Without it, the history of the permanent settlement of New England might have dated some scores of years later.  Whether Endicott’s expedition  to Block Island, reckless and inconsiderate, as most of the acts of that precipitate and hot-headed Puritan usually were, was justifiable or not, when considered in the light of its possible, and even probably, immediate consequences, it had only a happy result.  It provoked a war at a time when the Indians, foolishly divided among themselves, were easily subdued by the destruction of the most powerful and dangerous tribe among them, while the weaker, who had blindly helped in that destruction, could never again muster the courage or the strength to attempt, till it was too late, to drive the invaders back to the sea whence they came.  That the result should be recognized as a signal evidence of the goodness of God was only in accordance with the Puritan faith that they were peculiarly under the devine protection.  ‘The Lord was pleased,’ exclaims Captain Mason, with more force than elegance, at the close of his narrative &#8211; ‘the Lord was pleased to smite our Enemies in the hinder Parts, and to give us their Land for an Inheritance.’ ”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.americanhistoryprints.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=34</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
